Samsung shutting down CPU development in Austin

An acquaintance of mine was laid off from Samsung. He was a rank-and-file ASIC designer and worked on FPU unit for Samsung's new CPU. Another acquaintance, a project manager in the silicon field, relayed that supposedly ARM developed a new CPUs that are so great, that all competitors gave up and folded their CPU development, resulting in the layoffs. The online sources have details.

In the same time they gave up on in-house cores, Samsung announced Exynos 990, a standalone version of the 980, based on the successors of the Cortex family, developed by ARM, of course.

As someone said on Glassdoor, "great place to work until you're laid off".


As some of you might have noticed, Facebook started adding a tracking token to all URLs as a query string "?fbclid=XXXXXXXXX". I don't know how it works, exactly. Perhaps it rattles to FB when people re-inject these links into FB after they cycle through other social media. Either way, today I found a website that innocently fails to work when shared on FB: Whomp. If one tries to share a comic strip, such as "It's Training Men", FB appends its token, and makes the URL invalid.


A job at LinkedIn in my area includes the following instruction statement:

Don't apply if you can't really write code and don't have a github profile. This is a job for an expert level coder.

I remember the simpler times when LWN authors fretted about the SourceForge monopoly capturing all FLOSS projects.

P.S. For the record, I do have a profile at Github. It is required in order to contribute to RDO, because it is the only way to login in their Gerrit and submit patches for review. Ironically, Fedora offers a single sign-on with FAS and RDO is a Red Hat sponsored project, but nope — it's easier to force contributors into Github.

Docker Block Storage... say what again?

Found an odd job posting at the website of Rancher:

What you will be doing

  • Design and implement a block storage solution for Docker containers
  • Working on development of various aspects of the storage stack: consistency, reliability, replication and performance
  • Using Go for product development

Okay. Since they talk about consistency and replication together, this thing probably provides actual service, in addition to the necessary orchestration. Kind of the ill-fated Sheepdog. They may under-estimate the amount of work necesary, sure. Look no further than Ceph RBD. Remember how much work it took for a genius like Sage? But a certain arrogance is essential in a start-up, and Rancher only employs 150 people.

Also, nobody is dumb enough to write orchestration in Go, right? So this probably is not just a layer on top of Ceph or whatever.

Well, it's still possible that it's merely an in-house equivalent of OpenStack Cinder, and they want it in Go because they are a Go house and if you have a hammer everything looks like a nail.

Either way, here's the main question: what does block storage have to do with Docker?

Docker, as far as I know, is a container runtime. And containers do not consume block storage. They plug into a Linux kernel that presents POSIX to them, only namespaced. Granted, certain applications consume block storage through Linux, that is why we have O_DIRECT. But to roll out a whole service like this just for those rare appliations... I don't think so.

Why would anyone want block storage for (Docker) containers? Isn't it absurd? What am I missing and what is Rancher up to?


The key to remember here is that while running containers aren't using block storage, Docker containers are distributed as disk images, and they get a their own root filesystem by default. Therefore, any time anyone adds a Docker container, they have to allocate a block device and dump the application image into it. So, yes, it is some kind of Docker Cinder they are trying to build.

See Red Hat docs about managing Docker block storage in Atomic Host (h/t penguin42).


Anyone who ever worked with object storage knows that PUT creates, GET reads, POST updates, and DELETE deletes. Naturally, right? POST is such a strange verb with oddball encodings that it's perfect to update, while GET and PUT are matching twins like read(2) and write(2). Imagine my surprise, then, when I found that the official definition of RESTful makes POST create objects and PUT update them. There is even a FAQ, which uses sophistry and appeals to the authority of RFCs in order to justify this.

So, in the world of RESTful solipcism, you would upload an object foo into a bucket buk by issuing "POST /buk?obj=foo" [1], while "PUT /buk/foo" applies to pre-existing resources. Although, they had to admit that RFC-2616 assumes that PUT creates.

All this goes to show, too much dogma is not good for you.

[1] It's worse, actually. They want you to do "POST /buk", and receive a resource ID, generated by the server, and use that ID to refer to the resource.

Comment to 'О цифровой экономике и глобальных проблемах человечества' by omega_hyperon

Я это всё каждый день слышу. Эти люди берут вполне определившуюся тенденцию к замедлению научно-технического прогресса, и говорят - мы лучше знаем, что человечеству нужно. Отберите деньги у недостойных, и дайте таким умным как я, и прогресс снова пойдёт. А заодно защитим природу! И всегда капитализм виноват.

О том, что цивилизация топчется на месте, спору нет. А вот пара вещей о которых этот гандон умалчивает.

Во-первых, если отнять деньги у Диснея и отдать их исследовательскому институту, то денег не будет. Вроде по-русски говорит, а такого простого урука из распада СССР не вынес. Американская наука разгромила советскую науку во времена НТР прежде всего потому, что капиталистическая экономика предоставила экономическую базу для этой науки, а социалистическая экономика была провальной.

Вообще, если сравнить бюджет Эппла и Диснея с бюджетом Housing and Urban Development и аналогичных учреждений, то там разница на 2 порядка. Если кто-то хочет дать науке больше денег, то нужно не грабить Дисней, а прекратить давать халявщикам бесплатное жильё. Замедление науки и капитализма идут рука об руку и вызваны государственной политикой, а не каким-то там биткойном.

Во-вторых, кто вообще верит этим шарлатанам? Нам забивали баки про детей в Африке десятилетиями, а за время ужасного голода в Эфиопии её население увеличилось с 38 миллионов до 75 миллионов. То же самое произошло с белыми медведями. Площадь лесов на планете растёт. Допустим в Бразилии срубили какие-то леса под паздбища... Но кто в это поверит?

Этот кризис экспертизы - не шутка. Боязнь вакцин создана не капитализмом и биткойном, а загниванием и распадом системы научных исследований в целом. Он не назвал институт, бюджет которого он сравнил с Диснеем, а вот интересно, сколько там бездельников среди сотрудников.

Коллапс науки отражается не только в том как публика утратила веру в учёних. Объективные показатели тоже просели. Подтверждаемость публикаций очень плохая, и идёт вниз. Тоже биткойн виноват?

В обшцем большая часть этого нытя мне видится крайне вредной. Если он не в состоянии диагностировать причины кризиса, предлогаемые решения ничего нам не дадут, и биодиверии не прибавится.

View the entire thread this comment is a part of

Swift is 2 to 4 times faster than any competitor

Or so they say, at least for certain workloads.

In January of 2015 I led a project to evaluate and select a next-generation storage platform that would serve as the central storage (sometimes referred to as an active archive or tier 2) for all workflows. We identified the following features as being key to the success of the platform:

  • Utilization of erasure coding for data/failure protection (no RAID!)
  • Open hardware and the ability to mix and match hardware (a.k.a. support heterogeneous environments)
  • Open source core (preferred, but not required)
  • Self-healing in response to failures (no manual processes required, like replacing a drive)
  • Expandable online to exabyte-scale (no downtime for expansions or upgrades)
  • High availability / fault tolerance (no single point of failure)
  • Enterprise-grade support (24/7/365)
  • Visibility (dashboards to depict load, errors, etc.)
  • RESTful API access (S3/Swift)
  • SMB/NFS access to the same data (preferred, but not required)

In hindsight, I wish we would have included two additional requirements:

  • Transparently tier and migrate data to and from public cloud storage
  • Span multiple geographic regions while maintaining a single global namespace

We spent the next ~1.5 years evaluating the following systems:

  • SwiftStack
  • Ceph (InkTank/RedHat/Canonical)
  • Scality
  • Cloudian
  • Caringo
  • Dell/EMC ECS
  • Cleversafe / IBM COS
  • HGST/WD ActiveScale
  • NetApp StorageGRID
  • Nexenta
  • Qumulo
  • Quantum Lattus
  • Quobyte
  • Hedvig
  • QFS (Quantcast File System)
  • AWS S3
  • Sohonet FileStore

SwiftStack was the only solution that literally checked every box on our list of desired features, but that’s not the only reason we selected it over the competition.

The top three reasons behind our selection of SwiftStack were as follows:

  • Speed – SwiftStack was—by far—the highest-performing object storage platform — capable of line speed and 2-4x faster than competitors. The ability to move assets between our “tier 1 NAS” and “tier 2 object” with extremely high throughput was paramount to the success of the architecture.
  • [...]

Note: While SwiftStack 1space was not a part of the SwiftStack platform at the time of our evaluation and purchase, it would have been an additional deciding factor in favor of SwiftStack if it had been.

Interesting. It should be noted that performance of Swift is a great match for some workloads, but not for others. In particluar, Swift is weak on small-file workloads, such as Gnocchi, which writes a ton of 16-byte objects again and again. The overhead is a killer there, and not just on the wire: Swift has to update its accounting databases each and every time a write is done, so that "swift stat" shows things like quotas. Swift is also not particularly good at HPC-style workloads, which benefit from a great bisectional bandwidth, because we transfer all user data through so-called "proxy" servers. Unlike e.g. Ceph, Swift keeps the cluster topology hidden from the client, while a Ceph client actually tracks the ring changes, placement groups and their leaders, etc.. But as we can see, once the object sizes start climbing and the number of clients increases, Swift rapidly approaches the wire speed.

I cannot help noticing that the architecture in question has a front-facing cache of pool (tier 1), which is what the ultimate clients see instead of Swift. Most of the time, Swift is selected for its ability to serve tens of thousands of clients simultaneously, but not in this case. Apparently, the end-user invented ProxyFS independently.

There's no mention of Red Hat selling Swift in the post. Either it was not part of the evaluation at all, or the author forgot about it for the passing of time. He did list a bunch of rather weird and obscure storage solutions though.

PostgreSQL and upgrades

As mentioned previously, I run a personal Fediverse instance with Pleroma, which uses Postgres. On Fedora, of course. So, a week ago, I went to do the usual "dnf distro-sync --releasever=30". And then, Postgres fails to start, because the database uses the previous format, 10, and the packages in F30 require format 11. Apparently, I was supposed to dump the database with pg_dumpall, upgrade, then restore. But now that I have binaries that refuse to read the old format, dumping is impossible. Wow.

A little web searching found an upgrader that works across formats (dnf install postgresql-upgrade; postgresql-setup --upgrade). But that one also copies the database, like a dump-restore procedure would. What if the database is too large for this? Am I the only one who finds these practices unacceptable?

Postgres was supposed to be a solid big brother to a boisterous but unreliable upstart MySQL, kind of like Postfix and Exim. But this is just such an absurd fault, it makes me think that I'm missing something essential.

UPDATE: Kaz commented that a form of -compat is conventional:

When I've upgraded in the past, Ubuntu has always just installed the new version of postgres alongside the old one, to allow me to manually export and reimport at my leisure, then remove the old version afterward. Because both are installed, you could pipe the output of one dumpall to the psql command on the other database and the size doesn't matter. The apps continue to point at their old version until I redirect them.

Yeah, as much as I can tell, Fedora does not package anything like that.


With the recent move by Google to disable the ad-blockers in Chrome (except for Enterprise level customers[1]), the interest is sure to increase for methods of protection against the ad-delivered malware, other than browser plug-ins. I'm sure Barracuda will make some coin if it's still around. And on the free software side, someone is making an all-in-one package for Raspberry Pi, called "Pi-hole". It works by screwing with DNS, which is actually an impressive demonstration of what an attack on DNS can do.

An obvious problem with Pi-hole is what happens to laptops when they are outside of the home site protection. I suppose one could devise a clone of Pi-hole that plugs into the dnsmasq. Every Fedora system runs one, because NM needs it in order to support the correct lookup on VPNs {Update: see below}. The most valuable part of Pi-hole is the blocklist, the rest is just scripting.

[1] "Google’s Enterprise ad-blocking exception doesn’t seem to include G Suite’s low and mid-tier subscribers. G Suite Basic is $6 per user per month and G Suite Business is $12 per user month."

UPDATE: Ouch. A link by Roy Schestovitz made me remember how it actually worked, and I was wrong above: NM does not run dnsmasq by default. It only has a capability to do so, if you want DNS lookup on VPNs work correctly. So, every user of VPN enables "dns=dnsmasq" in NM. But it is not the default.

UPDATE: A reader mentions that he was rooted by ads served by Only 1 degree of separation (beyond Windows in my family).

Google Fi

Seen an amusing blog post today on the topic of the hideous debacle that is Google Fi (on top of being a virtual network). Here's the best part though:

About a year ago I tried to get my parents to switch from AT&T to Google Fi. I even made a spreadsheet for my dad (who likes those sorts of things) about how much money he could save. He wasn’t interested. His one point was that at anytime he can go in and get help from an AT&T rep. I kept asking “Who cares? Why would you ever need that?”. Now I know. He was paying almost $60 a month premium for the opportunity to able to talk to a real person, face-to-face! I would gladly pay that now.

Respect your elders!